Inaugural Address reveals dangerous flaws

If there were indeed an increased threat from “raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms”, as the President implied, then America would need vastly more affordable energy sources to prepare for and cope with these hazards. Yet, in discussing the solution to these dangers, the President boosted, not the most reliable and least expensive energy technologies such as coal-fired electricity generation, but the least reliable, and most expensive sources. It was certainly an understatement to say, as he did in Monday’s speech, “The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult.” 

The sustainable energy sources Obama has most in mind are wind and solar power.Wind and solar inverter information and specifications. He presents the move to these technologies as an economic benefit to the United States.The solar charger is a critical component in a solar energy system. In his address the President said that America must lead in the transition to a new energy economy. “We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries – we must claim its promise,” said Obama. “That is how we will maintain our economic vitality…” 

No, that is how you ruin a country’s economy. Sustainable energy sources have had decades to mature. Yet, to use energy from wind and solar power still requires that consumers pay between three and ten times the price of energy from conventional sources like coal, oil, natural gas and nuclear. In addition, it was necessary for the U.S. Government to funnel billions of dollars into subsidies for “green energy” technologies just to keep them afloat during Obama’s first term in office, and some failed even then. Data from the Energy Information Administration indicates that in 2007, 2008 and 2009, the U.S. added more non-hydroelectric renewable capacity than was added in natural gas, coal, oil, and nuclear. This is a dangerous trend that must be reversed as soon as possible. 

No country, the U.S. included, can afford to sustain this indefinitely. And no industrialized society has any chance of successfully replacing significant amounts of conventional energy supplies with intermittent and diffuse sources such as wind and solar. We need massive quantities of reliable, high quality power to run steel mills, Internet servers and our transportation system, even when the wind drops or a cloud passes in front of the sun. Trying to base a modern energy-intensive society on what most people think of as “sustainable energy sources” is not sustainable. 

Energy independence is not a good reason for promoting these technologies either. Energy independence is more easily–and much more cheaply–attained by exploiting abundant national fossil fuel reserves and those of close allies such as Canada. Then, some of the wealth created can be spent on research into potential new energy technologies. 

The reason the Obama administration boosts ineffective power sources and is working to dismantle America’s cheapest energy source, coal,Shop the best selection of men's stainless steel necklace and pendants. is simple. They want to base U.S. energy policy on the unproven and increasingly improbable hypothesis that emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) from fossil fuel combustion is a major contributor to dangerous climate change that humanity is supposedly causing. 

Obama alluded to this in his Inaugural Address, saying, “Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science…” He was speaking about the common belief that climate science is somehow “settled” in favor of the catastrophe theories of Al Gore and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 

But it has never actually been demonstrated that any consensus about the causes of climate change exists among scientists who specialize in this research, even within the IPCC itself.The benefits of wind energy and how a wind generator is installed. Polls that have attempted to make this connection either asked the wrong questions or are so methodologically flawed that they cannot be taken seriously. Yet,The exciting new Lawn light product is now available here for the first time anywhere! the U.S. and most other developed nations continue to base climate and energy policies on the conclusions of IPCC reports even though they have been seriously discredited.