Scituate’s Board of Health has decided on a narrow study of the
town’s wind turbine, despite requests from residents for a broader
analysis.
In a meeting Monday night, Board of Health officials
said they were wary of undertaking an extensive study that would provide
a more detailed sound analysis, as suggested by residents who say the
turbine has harmed their health.
“The methodology will get
challenged, results will be challenged, and I don’t know how to
interpret results with an invented method,” said board member Michael
Vazza.
Vazza recommended sticking with the turbine owner’s
suggested analysis, which mainly will assess whether the
power-generating equipment meets guidelines set by the state’s
Department of Environmental Protection.
Board members also declined to mandate a flicker study,We offer outdoor solar lighting and
elegant outdoor lanterns that light up the night effortlessly. which
would look at health impacts from the flickering shadows created when
the turbine’s blades rotate against the sun, or a survey asking
residents whether they have noticed any health affects, both steps
sought by neighbors.
Tom Thompson, who has represented the
residents, citing problems from the turbine’s operation, said they
anticipated the board’s decision. “This is an expected outcome . . .
there is no surprise here that the Board of Health would simply embrace
the strategy espoused by the wind developer,” he said.
Still to be determined is who will conduct the study. The residents and the turbine’s owner,This is how a skystream captures
energy from the wind. Scituate Wind LLC, have brought several
recommendations to the table, and Board of Health members said they’ll
assess the candidates at a later meeting.
The board made its
decision after a steering committee that had been appointed to recommend
the scope of the study was unable to reach a consensus.
Siemens installed two colossal offshore wind turbines this week,Marking machines and laser marking machine for
permanent part marking and product traceability. demonstrating
technology that could have a significant impact on the economics of wind
power.
The German company has been developing the turbines,
which produce double the maximum power output of its current models, for
several years. It has been testing the technology on land, and
installed the first ones offshore with the help of a new ship designed
specifically for the task. The turbines feature test blades that are 60
meters long, but Siemens intends to employ world-record 75-meter blades
eventually.
Yet for offshore wind power to compete with fossil
fuels, wind turbines may need to get even bigger. The new turbines
generate six megawatts of power in good wind. Several companies are
designing 10- and even 15-megawatt machines with 100-meter blades. These
blades would reach two-thirds of the way to the roof of the Empire
State Building. The push to supersize wind turbines is part of an effort
to reduce installation and maintenance costs, which can be far higher
than the cost of the turbines themselves. The pictures in this slideshow
give a sense of just why installation is so costly.
As
political opposition falls away from offshore wind projects, opponents
are turning more toward economic arguments against further development
of this technology, suggesting it will increase electricity rates and
ultimately cost jobs.
As with any new product or technology, the
first U.S. offshore wind farm will undoubtedly face steeper costs of
construction and development than its successors. But as the industry
grows, experience, technological developments,We provide excellent solar led light and LED solar garden lamp. and economies of scale will cause those costs to decline.We offer Laser engraver and
cutting machines for processing different materials. Multiple studies
of the offshore wind industry in Europe have shown that the “learning
rate”—the rate at which the overall cost of offshore wind energy
development declines over time—can be as high as 10 percent per year.
沒有留言:
張貼留言