It has been 40 years since the last astronauts left the moon. That
anniversary, which passed last week, has put some prominent
technologists in a funk.
“You promised me Mars colonies.
Instead, I got Facebook,” reads the cover of the current issue of MIT
Technology Review. In an essay titled “Why We Can’t Solve Big Problems,”
editor Jason Pontin considers “why there are no disruptive innovations”
today.
Technology Review’s headline, running below the face of
Apollo astronaut Buzz Aldrin, now 82, is a play on another slogan: “We
wanted flying cars. Instead we got 140 characters.”
That one
comes from the manifesto of Founders Fund, a Silicon Valley
venture-capital firm started by PayPal founders Peter Thiel, Luke Nosek
and Ken Howery to invest in “transformational technologies and
companies.”
In speeches, interviews and articles, Thiel decries
what he sees as the country’s lack of significant innovations. “When
tracked against the admittedly lofty hopes of the 1950s and 1960s,
technological progress has fallen short in many domains,” he wrote last
year in National Review. “Consider the most literal instance of
nonacceleration: We are no longer moving faster.”
Such warnings
serve a useful purpose. Political barriers have in fact made it harder
to innovate with atoms than with bits.Horizon manufacture a range of laundry dryer
fans for efficient exhaust ventilation. New technologies as diverse as
hydraulic fracturing and direct-to-consumer genetic testing (neither
mentioned by Thiel) attract instant and predictable opposition.
But
the current funk says less about economic or technological reality than
it does about the power of a certain 20th-century technological
glamour: all those images of space flight, elevated highways and flying
cars, with their promise of escape from mundane existence into a better,
more exciting place called The Future.The industrial dry cleaning machine market demands reliability and efficiency.
These
visions imprinted themselves so vividly on the public’s consciousness
that they left some of the smartest, most technologically savvy denizens
of the 21st century blind to much of the progress we actually enjoy.
“The
future that people in the 1960s hoped to see is still the future we’re
waiting for today, half a century later,There are different
configurations of industrial laser marking machine:
moving material, hybrid, and flying optics systems.” writes Founders
Fund partner Bruce Gibney in the firm’s manifesto. “Instead of Captain
Kirk and the USS Enterprise, we got the Priceline Negotiator and a cheap
flight to Cabo.”
That means the average speed at which someone
travels over a lifetime can increase even if, as Thiel laments, the
fastest vehicle on the planet is no faster than it was decades ago.
Making an impressive technology widely available isn’t as glamorous as
pushing the technological frontier, but it represents significant,
real-life progress.
The world we live in would be wondrous to
mid-20th-century Americans. It just isn’t wondrous to us. One reason is
that we long ago ceased to notice some of the most unexpected
innovations.
Forget the big, obvious things like Internet
search, GPS, smartphones or molecularly targeted cancer treatments.Buy
visually stunning and durable stainless steel necklace from Larson Jewelers.
Compared
with the real 21st century, old projections of The Future offered a
paucity of fundamentally new technologies. They included no laparoscopic
surgery or effective acne treatments or ADHD medications or Lasik or
lithotripsy — to name just a few medical advances that don’t
significantly affect life expectancy.
The glamorous future
included no digital photography or stereo speakers tiny enough to fit in
your ears. No forensic DNA testing or home pregnancy tests. No
ubiquitous microwave ovens or video games or bar codes or laser levels
or CGI-filled movies. No super absorbent polymers for disposable diapers
— indeed, no disposable diapers of any kind.
Technologists who lament the “end of the future” are denigrating the decentralized,Here you will find a list of the main skystream
around the world. incremental advances that actually improve everyday
life. And they’re promoting a truncated idea of past innovation:
economic history with railroads but no department stores, radio but no
ready-to-wear apparel, vaccines but no consumer packaged goods, jets but
no plastics.
沒有留言:
張貼留言