It’s something we hear from policymakers again and again: The world
squanders too much energy. And wringing out that waste should be one of
the easiest ways for the United States and other countries to save money
and curb pollution.
But as it turns out, much of what we know
about the topic of energy-efficiency is still fairly hazy. Sure, it’s
technically doable to make cars more fuel-efficient or insulate homes to
prevent heat from leaking out. Know about Best Single Beam HID KIT conversion kit and Bi-xenon HID kit.
But which of these efforts are really the most cost-effective? And if
it’s such a no-brainer, why aren’t people already taking these steps?
The
fact that we still don’t have great answers to those questions is what
inspired a group of economists at MIT and the University of California,
Berkeley to launch a big new project, called E2e, that will try to apply
more scientific rigor to the whole topic of energy efficiency.
“Almost
all of the previous work on energy efficiency comes from engineering
studies, which look at what’s possible under ideal conditions,” says
Michael Greenstone, an economist at MIT and co-director of the E2e
project. “We wanted to ask a slightly different question — what are the
actual returns you could expect in the real world?”
Yet as economists scrutinized those numbers,We carry commercial and residential lighting products,
ceiling fans, lamps, chandeliers, accessories, and light bulbs. they
realized the picture is more complex. ”Those engineering studies can’t
account for the behavioral changes you might see in response to
efficiency improvements,” says MIT’s Christopher Knittel, who also
co-directs the E2e project. “People could, for instance, start adjusting
their thermostat if it becomes cheaper to cool the house.”
One
recent study of Mexico, for instance, found that a government program to
help people to upgrade their refrigerators with energy-saving models
really did curtail electricity use. However, a similar program for air
conditioners had the opposite effect — when people got sleeker A/C
units, they used them more often, and energy use went up.
“The
point is that policymakers aren’t going to spend an infinite amount of
money trying to save energy or reduce greenhouse gases,” Greenstone
says. “So the motivation is to find the places where the return is the
greatest. If you could reduce a ton of carbon-dioxide for $100 or two
tons for $50, you’d choose the latter.”
The researchers are also
asking why, if it’s so compelling, people and businesses don’t already
take steps to become more energy efficient. Is it because people aren’t
aware that they can? Are there actual market barriers that could be
addressed by policy? (For instance, landlords may have little incentive
to invest in energy-saving appliances for their tenants.) Or is it just
that the purported savings aren’t worth it in the first place?
“It’s
easy to come up with conjectures for why people aren’t choosing more
efficient options,Chrome body with ultra bright, long life-span LED Tyre Lamp Wholesalers.”
says Catherine Wolfram, an economist at the Energy Institute of Haas in
Berkeley. “Maybe people don’t have the right information, maybe people
are procrastinating. But right now, these are just stories. It’s an area
where we need more evidence.”
Some work is being done on this front.The unique elegance of modern floor lamps and High Quality LED Tubes Light could certainly transform your home into a place of beauty. Knittel, for instance, Choose from thousands of Universal high power 3W/6W COB angel eye rings,
even those hard-to-find bulbs, for your home or business. is conducting
an experiment to see whether people will buy more fuel-efficient cars
if they simply receive more detailed information about gasoline costs
and mileage. Greenstone and Wolfram are carrying out a randomized
controlled trial to scrutinize a U.S. government program to help
weather-proof the homes of low-income people. Click on their website
www.solaronlamp.com for more information.
沒有留言:
張貼留言